Postmortem Template
Blameless. Focus on system/process causes, not individual blame. Every postmortem ends with owned, tracked action items — a postmortem without action items is incomplete.
markdown
# Postmortem: <incident title>**Date:** <date> **Severity:** <sev1/2/3> **Duration:** <start> – <end> (<total time>)**Author(s):** <who wrote this> **Status:** Draft | Reviewed | Final## Summary<2-4 sentences: what happened, what was the user-facing impact, how was it resolved. Should be understandable by someone outside the team.>## Impact- <who/what was affected, quantified where possible: error rate, affected user count, duration of degradation, any data impact>## Timeline<Pull from the contemporaneous incident-timeline log kept during the response. All times in one consistent timezone, clearly labeled.>| Time | Event ||---|---|| HH:MM | <first signal — alert fired, user report, etc.> || HH:MM | <detection — when someone confirmed it was real> || HH:MM | <key investigation step or finding> || HH:MM | <mitigation action taken> || HH:MM | <impact confirmed resolved> |## Root cause<the actual mechanism — not just "a bug," but what specifically: e.g. "a config change removed a required env var validation, causing the service to start with a null database URL and silently no-op writes." Distinguish root cause from contributing factors below.>## Contributing factors<things that made this worse, slower to detect, or slower to mitigate than it should have been — e.g. "no alert existed for this failure mode," "the rollback required a manual step that wasn't documented." These are usually where the best action items come from.>## What went well<detection speed, an existing runbook that worked, a mitigation that worked cleanly — worth naming so it's reinforced, not just what went wrong.>## Action items| Action | Owner | Priority | Tracking link ||---|---|---|---|| <specific, concrete action — not "improve monitoring" but "add alert for X metric threshold Y"> | <name> | P0/P1/P2 | <issue link> |## Blameless noteThis document focuses on systems and processes, not individuals. If a person's actionis mentioned, it's to describe what information/tooling/process would have led to adifferent outcome — not to assign fault.